Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
action actual agreement amount appears applied arise assets assignment authority Beav benefit bill bond charge circumstances claim common law consideration considered contract conversion conveyance court of equity covenant created creditor death debtor debts decided decree deed defendant devised directed doctrine effect election enforce entitled equal evidence executed executor express fact favour fraud fund gift give given grant ground hands heir held hold husband intention interest jurisdiction land legacy liable Lord marriage married ment mortgage nature necessary notice object original owner paid particular party payment performance person personal estate plaintiff possession prevent principle purchaser question real estate reason received reference regard relation relief remainder remedy respect result rule separate settled settlement specific statute subsequent sufficient suit taken tion trust unless Vict whole wife
Sivu 46 - And be it further enacted, that all declarations or creations of trusts or confidences of any lands, tenements or hereditaments shall be manifested and proved by some writing, signed by the party who is, by law, enabled to declare such trust, or by his last will in writing, or else they shall be utterly void and of none effect.
Sivu 228 - Land or Hereditaments so charged shall, as between the different Persons claiming through or under the deceased Person , be primarily liable to the Payment of all Mortgage Debts with which the same shall be charged, every Part thereof, according to its Value, bearing a proportionate Part of the Mortgage Debts charged on the whole thereof...
Sivu 228 - By the 1st section of the former act it is enacted, that "when any person shall, after the 31st day of December, 1854, die seised of or entitled to any estate or interest in any land or other hereditaments which shall at the time of his death be charged with the payment of any sum or sums of money by way of mortgage, and such person shall not by his will or deed or other document, have signified any contrary or other intention...
Sivu 488 - ... it shall be lawful for the same Court, if it shall think fit, to award damages to the party injured, either in addition to or in substitution for such injunction or specific performance, and such damages may be assessed in such manner as the Court shall direct.
Sivu 266 - ... or upon any agreement that is not to be performed within the space of one year from the making thereof; unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith...
Sivu 35 - ... and acquiesced for a great length of time. Nothing can call forth this court into activity but conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence; where these are wanting, the court is passive and does nothing.
Sivu 299 - ... or property so acquired by her through the exercise of any literary, artistic, or scientific skill, and all investments of such wages, earnings, money, or property, shall be deemed and taken to be property held and settled to her separate use, independent of any husband to whom she may be married, and her receipts alone shall be a good discharge for such wages, earnings, money, and property.
Sivu 591 - WALES: Including Introduction, Statutes, Explanatory Notes, Cases, and Index. By JOHN LOCKE, MP, QC, Recorder of Brighton. The Fifth Edition, in which are introduced the GAME LAWS of SCOTLAND and IRELAND. By GILMORE EVANS, of the Inner Temple, Barrister-at-Law.
Sivu 364 - But where each party is equally innocent, and there is no concealment of facts which the other party has a right to know, and no surprise or imposition exists, the mistake or ignorance, whether mutual or unilateral, is treated as laying no foundation for equitable interference. It is strictly damnum absque injuria.* § 152.
Sivu 409 - And, in the case put, the surety is held to be discharged, for this reason, because the creditor, by so giving time to the principal, has put it out of the power of the surety to consider whether he will have recourse to his remedy against the principal, or not ; and because he, in fact, cannot have the same remedy against the principal as he would have had under the original contract...