Civil Justice in the Age of Human RightsAshgate Publishing, Ltd., 2007 - 251 sivua This text is concerned with the effects of the Human Rights Act (HRA) on civil procedure and in particular its effects on the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). It asks whether Lord Woolf was right to worry that the new civil procedure regime could be susceptible to numerous HRA challenges. |
Sisältö
Director of the Assets Recovery Agency v Ashton | 1 |
Access to Justice Act 1999 126 | 6 |
The Structure of the Argument | 7 |
The Scope of the Engagement | 13 |
Wade 2004 EWHC 2675 QBD 146 | 14 |
Bill of Rights 1689 47 | 15 |
14 30 | 17 |
Proportionality | 22 |
3 | 126 |
128 | 128 |
Germany No 1361188 | 129 |
Attorney General of Belize 2005 UKPC 12 194 215 240 | 131 |
Practice Direction Part 25 | 132 |
Practice Direction Part 27 53 63 69 | 135 |
80 113 131 138 171 172 | 136 |
UK No 3090002 9 September 2003 ECtHR 77 | 137 |
Case Relating to Certain Aspects of the Laws | 27 |
2 | 28 |
GodinMendoza 2004 UKHL 3 2950 | 29 |
IML London 2002 1 WLR 3271 206 | 33 |
A FC v Secretary of State for the Home | 41 |
Inquiries Act 2005 58 130 | 46 |
Attorney General v Douglas 2001 EWHC Admin 610 127 | 48 |
Thompson 1997 EWCA Civ 2179 128 | 49 |
Attorney General v Leveller Magazine 1979 AC 440 56 | 56 |
Rimmer 1968 AC 910 62 174 176 | 62 |
31 43 | 64 |
Children Act 1989 6668 | 66 |
Brazil 2002 EWCA Civ 1135 135 | 71 |
DSNB Subsea v Petroleum Geo | 74 |
UK No 2241493 15 November 1996 ECtHR 178 | 80 |
Emery Reimbold and Strick DJ and C Withers | 82 |
Ethical Standards Board for England | 83 |
Salkeld 396 91 ER 343 196 | 84 |
Cassell 1972 AC 1027 3243 | 86 |
H H Saudi Research | 89 |
Southwark LBC R on the application | 90 |
Practice Note Citation of Authorities | 91 |
France Nos 20 94092 20 94192 | 92 |
UK No 1917891 22 November 1995 ECtHR 18 190 | 93 |
Calvert 1960 2 QB 201 42 | 94 |
Masry 2004 EWCA Civ 1353 | 95 |
Slovakia No 4722799 | 99 |
Faluyi 2001 EWCA Civ 998 30 31 | 104 |
UK No 1046183 30 March 1989 ECtHR 32 134 | 111 |
Campbell and Fell v UK Nos 781977 | 112 |
Judicature Act 1873 | 113 |
Slovakia No 3975498 13 January 2000 ECtHR | 114 |
102 113 114 115 116 | 116 |
CIBC Mellon Trust v Mora Hotel | 118 |
Eagil Trust v PiggottBrown 1985 3 All ER 119 84 85 | 119 |
CoOperative Retail Services v Guardian | 120 |
St Albans Crown Court 1975 QB 73 24 208 | 121 |
Limitation Act 1980 123 124 | 123 |
Arbuthnot Latham Bank v Trafalgar | 125 |
University of Lincolnshire 2000 3 All ER 752 91 | 138 |
UK 21 September 1994 ECtHR 25 112 | 141 |
Practice Direction Part 39 53 63 64 65 82 148 158 | 142 |
Part 52 | 143 |
Arrow Nominees v Blackledge 2000 2 BCLC 167 117 | 145 |
Practice Direction Part 52 84 91 209 235 | 148 |
UK No 2210793 25 February 1997 ECtHR 210 | 149 |
Magna Carta 1215 230 | 150 |
Cantor Index v Lister 2002 CP Rep 25 | 151 |
Civil Procedure Act 1997 6 13 163 236 | 154 |
Disclosure and Restrictions on Evidence | 155 |
Scotland Act 1998 214 | 156 |
Wilbraham 2004 EWCA Civ 1668 84 85 | 161 |
Bank of Scotland v A 2001 EWCA Civ 52 164 | 164 |
Fels 2005 EWCA Civ 226 165 167 | 165 |
UK No 2141302 27 April 2004 ECtHR | 169 |
Smith 1998 1 All ER 973 5669 | 173 |
Head 1984 Ch 290 104 | 175 |
Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 | 178 |
Edwards and Lewis v UK No 3964798 | 179 |
Common Law Procedure Act 1854 42 | 182 |
UK No 2229993 25 February 1997 ECtHR | 183 |
Coopers and Lybrand 2000 3 All ER 910 79 81184 | 184 |
Impartial and Independent Judges | 185 |
State Immunity Act 1978 129 | 188 |
Part 54 | 194 |
ASM Shipping of India v TTMI of England | 195 |
Hammersmith and Fulham Conservative | 201 |
Ganju 31 March 1999 123 | 202 |
Dickson 2001 UKPC D4 192 203 204 219 | 203 |
Amec Capital Projects v Whitefriars City | 207 |
Sweden No 5585300 8 February 2005 ECtHR 131 142 | 209 |
Johnson 1979 AC 264 33 | 210 |
Commonwealth of Australia | 212 |
Register of Judgments Orders and Fines | 236 |
And So? | 239 |
247 | |
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
Admin administration of justice application arbitration Article 6(1 Austria Chapter cited Civil Procedure claim claimant client common law concerned confidentiality considered constitutional Convention rights costs Council Court of Appeal criminal decision defendant disclosure discussed dispute documents duty ECHR ECtHR effect English equality of arms European evidence EWCA Civ EWHC fact fair trial February give Home Department House of Lords Human Rights Act impartial important issue judge judgment judicial July jurisdiction lawyers legal professional privilege legal system limited litigants in person Lord Phillips Lord Steyn Lord Woolf matter McKenzie friend mediation obligation open justice oral hearing overriding objective parties Practice Direction principle proceedings proportionality protection provides public interest immunity question reasons refused relation relevant requires right of access rule Scott v Scott Secretary settlement Spycatcher Strasbourg jurisprudence tribunal UKHL United Kingdom waived waiver