| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 448 sivua
...the same footing, of like obligation on the courts and affected parties. "Both are declared ... to be the supreme law of the land, and no superior efficacy is given to either over the other." Whitney v. Robertson, 124 US 190, 194 (1888). Since a statute and a treaty have the same status under... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1977 - 1720 sivua
...and made of like obligation, with an act of legislation. Both are declared by that instrument to be the supreme law of the land, and no superior efficacy is given to either отег the other. When the two relate to the same subject, the courts will always endeavor to construe... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1978 - 352 sivua
...the same footing, of like obligation on the courts and affected parties. "Both are declared ... to be the supreme law of the land, and no superior efficacy is given to either over the other." Whitney v. Robertson, 124 US 190, 194 (1888). Since a statute and a treaty have the same status under... | |
| Philippines. Supreme Court - 1919 - 1144 sivua
...footing and made of like obligation with an Act of Congress. Both are declared by that instrument to be the supreme law of the land, and no superior efficacy is given to either over the other. If, however, the treaty and the Act of Congress are inconsistent, the one last in date will control.... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1979 - 450 sivua
...legislation. Both are declared by that instrument to be the supreme law of the land, and no supreme efficacy is given to either over the other. When the...subject the courts will always endeavor to construe them as to give effect to both, if that can be done without violating the language of either; but if the... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services - 1979 - 522 sivua
...legislation. Both are declared by that instrument to be the supreme law of the land, and no supreme efficacy is given to either over the other. When the two relate to the same subject, the courts \\ill always endeavor to construe them so as to give effect to both, if that can be done without violating... | |
| |