 | James Bradley Thayer - 1900 - 1296 sivua
...that the evidence must be confined to the issue. This rule excludes all evidence of collateral facts which are incapable of affording any reasonable presumption...inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute. 1 Greenlcaf s Ev. 8. 52. v It is not practicable to lay down any principle by which a judge should... | |
 | James Henry Deering - 1900 - 892 sivua
...22. 74. Under the rule that testimony must be confined to the issues, evidence of collateral facts, which are incapable of affording any reasonable presumption...inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute is inadmissible. (People v. Lynch, 122 Cal. 501.) 75. Matters which circumstantially tend to prove... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1900 - 724 sivua
...v. The People, 129 111. 521; 3 Russell on Crimes (5th Ed.), 368; 1 Roscoe on Crim. Ev., 8th Ed. 92. This rule excludes all evidence of collateral facts, or those which are incapable of offering any reasonable presumption or inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute. The... | |
 | Oregon - 1902 - 1036 sivua
...when it affects the credibility of a witness. [L. 1862 ; D. Cd. §694; H. С. §704.] This section excludes all evidence of collateral facts, or those...Inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute: State v. Olds, 18 Or. 440, 22 Рас. 940. The admission of Immaterial testimony is sufficient ground... | |
 | 1904 - 1338 sivua
...The rule that the evidence must correspond with the allegations and be confined to the point in Issue excludes all evidence of collateral facts, or those...inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute. The reason is that such evidence tends to draw away the minds of the jurors from the point in issue,... | |
 | 1904 - 1244 sivua
...collateral facts, or those which are incapable of affording any reasonable presumptions or inferences as to the principal fact or matter in dispute; and the reason is that such evidence tonds to draw the minds of the jurors away from the point in issue, and to excite prejudice, and mislead... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1905 - 1164 sivua
...the policeman did not know that he waa in the act of committing it at the time of the homicide. But evidence of collateral facts or those which are incapable...inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute is generally excluded. The reason is that such evidence tends to draw away the minds of the jurors... | |
 | Theodore Frelinghuysen Cornell Demarest - 1905 - 152 sivua
...' McLoghlin v. Nat. Mohawk Vail. Bank, 65 Hun, 342-348. OBJECTION: INCOMPETENT, IRRELEVANT, ETC. 49 facts, or those which are incapable of affording any...inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute.' . . . Such evidence is too remote, inconclusive and uncertain in its bearing; and .... many illustrations... | |
 | Thomas Johnson Michie - 1906 - 856 sivua
...The general rule is that collateral facts are inadmissible in evidence, because they do not afford any reasonable presumption or inference as to the principal fact or matter in dispute, and tend to draw away the minds of the jury from the point in issue, excite prejudice, and mislead. Whitelaw... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 800 sivua
...distinct and substantive offense cannot be admitted to show the commission of another offense, and this rule excludes all evidence of collateral facts, or those which are incnpable of affording a reasonable presumption or logical inference as to the principal fact or matter... | |
| |
The rule that the evidence must correspond with the allegations and be confined to the point in issue excludes all evidence of collateral facts, or those which are incapable of affording any reasonable presumption or inference as to the principal fact... 
