[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ]

...the carrier for shipping the shaft. The familiar rule of decision in that case contained two prongs. "Where two parties have made a contract which one...reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in...

...too remote is a question of law and is tested by the rule in Hadley v. Baxendale ( \ 854) 9 Ex 341: Where two parties have made a contract which one of...them has broken, the damages which the other party receives for that breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either...

[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ]

[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ]

[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ]

[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ]

...Vorhersehbarkeitsregel fest, die für alle 27 Fälle des vertraglichen Schadensersatzes gelten sollte: „Where two parties have made a contract which one...reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably...

[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ]

...which it should not. The classic exposition of the test is that of Alderson B in Hadley v Baxendale: 'Where two parties have made a contract which one...reasonably be considered, either arising naturally, ie according to the usual course of things from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably...