...Power Co., Chat practices, procedures, or tests, "neutral In terms of Intent", cannot be used where they operate to freeze the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices, unless they are justified on grounds of business necessity. The Conirrittee's Report not only reflected...

...401 US 424, 3 FEP 175 (US SCt 1971). In this case, the OS Supreme Court stated that, 'Under the Act, practices, procedures, or tests neutral on their face,...of intent, cannot be maintained if they operate to "freeze1 the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices. .. .The Act proscribes not only...

...in the past to favor an identifiable group of white employees over other employees. Under the Act, practices, procedures, or tests neutral on their face,...status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices (401 US 424, 429-30). The Court also pointed out that "Congress directed the thrust of the Act to the...

....employees over other employees. Under the Act, practices, procedures, or tests neutral on their face, and neutral In terms of Intent, cannot be maintained If they operate to 'freeze' the statue quo of prior discriminatory employment practlcae." Id. *t 429-30. The diploma and teatlng requirement!...

...legally informed decisions about "procedures or tests [which although] neutral on their face . . . operate to 'freeze' the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices." The Supreme Court has ruled such measures unlawful. "The Guidelines (the Court explained in Albemarle Paper...

...legally informed decisions about "procedures or tests [which although] neutral on their face . . . operate to 'freeze' the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices." The Supreme Court has ruled such measures unlawful. "The Guidelines (the Court explained in Albemarle Paper...

...401 US 424, 3 FTP 175 (US SCt 1971). In this case, the US Supreme Court stated that, "Under the Act, practices, procedures, or tests neutral on their face,...of intent, cannot be maintained if they operate to 'freeze1 the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices. .. .The Act proscribes not only...

...401 US 424, 3 FEP 175 (US SCt 1971) . In this case, the US Supreme Court stated that, "Under the Act, practices, procedures, or tests neutral on their face, and even neutral in terras ot intent, cannot be maintained if they operate to 'freeze' the status quo of prior discriminatory...

...that this alone was not enough to justify them. In Griggs. Chief 1ustice Berger wrote. "Under the Act. practices, procedures, or tests neutral on their face,...quo of prior discriminatory employment practices" t401 L'.S. 424. 430t. The company that was sued in Grigg\ gave an aptitude test to those without high...

...peet to favor an identifiable group of white employees over other employees, end that under the act, practices, procedures, or tests neutral on their face,...neutral in terms of intent, cannot be maintained if they operated to "freeze" the status quo of prior discriminatory employment practices. The Court added that...