| 1894 - 992 sivua
...DAMAGES. The following rule, formulated in Hadley т. Bozendale, 0 Exch. 341: "Where two parties huve made a contract, which one of them has broken, the...receive in respect of such breach of contract should be either such as may fairly and substantially be considered as arising naturally, ie according to the... | |
| 1896 - 1258 sivua
...it has been repeatedly approved by this court. It is thus stated, in the language of Anderson, В.: "Where two parties have made a contract, which one of them has broken, the damages which the other ought to receive In respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably... | |
| 1916 - 1226 sivua
...compensate the plaintiff for the injury which he had suffered. "In cases of breach of contract the damages should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of the contract itself, or such as may... | |
| Victor P. Goldberg - 1989 - 270 sivua
...formulation of the doctrine of remoteness in contract was that of Alderson, B. in Hadley v. Baxendale: Where two parties have made a contract which one of...reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of 87 contract itself, or such as may... | |
| R. G. Frey, Christopher W. Morris - 1991 - 450 sivua
...the carrier for shipping the shaft. The familiar rule of decision in that case contained two prongs. "Where two parties have made a contract which one...reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in... | |
| Carole Chui, Derek Roebuck - 1991 - 212 sivua
...too remote is a question of law and is tested by the rule in Hadley v. Baxendale ( \ 854) 9 Ex 341: Where two parties have made a contract which one of...them has broken, the damages which the other party receives for that breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either... | |
| Peter Birks - 1996 - 362 sivua
...which it should not. The classic exposition of the test is that of Alderson B in Hadley v Baxendale: 'Where two parties have made a contract which one...reasonably be considered, either arising naturally, ie according to the usual course of things from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably... | |
| Florian Faust - 1996 - 404 sivua
...Vorhersehbarkeitsregel fest, die für alle 27 Fälle des vertraglichen Schadensersatzes gelten sollte: „Where two parties have made a contract which one...reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably... | |
| M. P. O'Reilly - 1996 - 428 sivua
...Reasonable foreseeability The test of reasonable foreseeability is set out in Hadley v. Baxendale.29 "Where two parties have made a contract which one of them has broken, the damage which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be [1] such... | |
| Michael G. Bridge - 1998 - 722 sivua
...Baxendale itself, the remoteness rule was expressed by Baron Alderson in the form of two branches or limbs: Where two parties have made a contract which one of...reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably... | |
| |