But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful... The Federal Reporter - Sivu 4741905Koko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta
 | 1912
...result. They virtually took the position that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, not wanton, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act, and that it (the injury) was such as might 41 See Kennedy, J., in Dulieu v. White, [1901]... | |
 | 1919
...rule thus: "It is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was a natural and probable consequence of the negligence, or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been... | |
 | 1913
...a fundamental rule of law that to recover damages on account of unintentional negligence of another It must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. St L.,... | |
 | 1895
...v. George, 61 Tex. 353. An act may be said to be the proximate cause of nu injury when the injury is the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and which, in the light of attending circumstances, should have been foreseen. Eames v. Railway Co., 63... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1887
...act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, is not warranted unless it appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negHAdams v. Young. gence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of... | |
 | 1913
...of was the proximate cause of the injury, and, satisfying yourself in this respect, you must believe that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence as alleged in plaintiff's complaint, and that the injury, if any, ought to have been foreseen in the... | |
 | 1902
..."In order to warrant a finding that negligence * * * is the proximate cause of an injury, It should appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act. and that It ought to have been foreseen,— not necessarily the precise, actual injury,... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1928
...said : But it is generally held, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. It is well known that time is an important factor in modern business. Where a shipment of shingles... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1916
...regard to the wires was the proximate cause of the injury. In order to warrant a finding that negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances, but it is not... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1913
...instruments. (Page 62.) 8. SAME — PROXIMATE CAUSE. — To warrant a finding that an act of negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act, and that it ought reasonably to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances,... | |
| |