| BCP7205 - 1984 - 1042 sivua
...of Faith: and yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church be a w1tness and a keeper of Holy Writ, yet, as it ought not to decree... | |
| 394 sivua
...of Faith; And yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it he repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church he a witness and a keeper of holy Writ, yet,... | |
| S. M. Waddams - 1992 - 400 sivua
...of faith: and yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain anything that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church be a witness and a keeper of Holy Writ, yet, as it ought not to decree... | |
| Frederick Houk Borsch - 1999 - 228 sivua
...of Faith: and yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church be a witness and a keeper of Holy Writ, yet, as it ought not to decree... | |
| Michael Watts - 1993 - 212 sivua
...reminds us that it 'is not lawful for the Church to ordain anything that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another'. Now the Church of England appears to some of us to have done just that: and taken up a position which... | |
| Michael Wheeler - 1994 - 314 sivua
...Faith . . . yet it is not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to another'. The substance of both these articles figured prominently in discussion on the question of the authority... | |
| P. E. Satterthwaite, David F. Wright - 1994 - 358 sivua
...mean not only, in terms of Article 20 of the Church of England, that the Church (note benel) may not 'so expound one place of Scripture that it be repugnant to another', but that we perpetually ask ourselves and our fellow-labourers whether our subtly differentiated expositions... | |
| Richard Mocket - 1995 - 456 sivua
...faith; and yet it is not lawfull for the Church to ordeine anie thinge that is contrarie to godes word written, neither may it so expound one place of scripture that it be repugnant to an other. Wherfore, although the Church be a wittnes and a keper of holy writ: yet, as it ought not... | |
| JOHN M. KRUMM - 1996 - 190 sivua
...plainly limited ("it is not lawful for the church to ordain anything that is contrary to God's Word written, neither may it so expound one place of scripture, that it be repugnant to another"). What is perhaps most striking about the 39 Articles is that in some of the deep matters of the Christian... | |
| Robert Hannaford - 1996 - 172 sivua
...still more clearly: "It is not lawful for the Church to ordain anything that is contrary to God's word written, neither may it so expound one place of Scripture that it be repugnant to another. Wherefore, although the Church be witness and a keeper of Holy Writ, yet as it ought not to decree... | |
| |