 | 1956 - 554 sivua
[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ] | |
 | Alfred William Brian Simpson - 1987 - 458 sivua
...statement is that of Parke B. in Robinson v. Harman (1848) 21 : " The rule of the common law is, that where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed." But there are earlier formulations of a principle which was formulated in terms of giving the plaintiff... | |
 | Peter Gillies - 1988 - 404 sivua
[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ] | |
 | Neil Thompson - 1991 - 256 sivua
[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ] | |
 | 2001 - 696 sivua
[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ] | |
 | E. Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood - 1992 - 728 sivua
...must be foreseeable". The same basic principles are met in common law. The rule of English law is that "where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed" (Robinson v. Harman (1848) 1 Exch. 850, at 855; and in particular as to loss of profits: Anson's Law... | |
 | 1988 - 460 sivua
[ Valitettavasti tämän sivun sisältö on rajoitettu ] | |
 | R. Rayfuse - 1993 - 758 sivua
...must be foreseeable". The same basic principles are met in common law. The rule of English law is that "where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach...to damages, as if the contract had been performed" (Robinson \. Harman ( 1 848) 1 Exch . 850, at 855 ; and in particular as to loss of profits: Anson's... | |
| |
The rule of the common law is, that where a party sustains a loss by reason of a breach of contract, he is, so far as money can do it, to be placed in the same situation, with respect to damages, as if the contract had been performed. 
