State, in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity ; or where is drawn in question the... American Annual Register - Sivu 60muokkaaja - 1832Koko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta
| United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 1022 sivua
...respecting ' 'the validity of a statute of, or any authority exercised under the State" of California, "on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws or the United States;" or respecting " the construction of a clause of the Constitution, or of... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1146 sivua
...treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity, or where is drawn in question the...drawn In question the construction of any clause of the Constitution, or of a treaty or statute of, or commission held under the United States, and the... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1920 - 996 sivua
...treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the...the United States, and the decision is in favor of their validity." Judicial Code, § 237, Act September 6, 1916, chap. 448, 39 Stat. at L. 726, Сотр.... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1114 sivua
...treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity, or where is drawn in question the...their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the Unitod States, and the decision Is In favor of such their validity; or where Is drawn In... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 1906 sivua
...in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, any state,...ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of such, their validity may be re-examined,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1918 - 1592 sivua
...[166] treaty or statute of, or authority exercised under, the United States. " Neither did it challenge the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any state, on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United- States. Challenging the power... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1920 - 1138 sivua
...decision in the suit could be bad, where is drawn in question the validity of a ... statute of, or un authority exercised under any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitulion, trcalics or laws of the United States, and the citcisiou is iu favor of their validity."... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1921 - 1260 sivua
...In order to give this court jurisdiction to review the judgment of a state court on the ground that the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any state, was drawn in question for repugnancy to the Constitution or laws of the United States, and thi.it its... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1920 - 1224 sivua
...brought up to the Federal Supreme Court by writ of error to a state court unless there is drawn in question the validity of a statute of or an authority exercised under the state, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Federal Constitution, treaties, or laws. Other... | |
| |