...permisbible." In the case of The Daniel ШП, 77 U. 8. 10 Wall. Г)57, 565 [19: 9»9, 1002], this court said: "Whenever a commodity has begun to move, as an article of trade, from one Slate to another, commerce in that commodity, between the states has commenced." See also Gloucester...

...destined for other States, or goods brought from without the limits of Michigan and destined to go places within that State, she was engaged in commerce...that commerce; for whenever a commodity has begun tt> move as an article of trade from one State to another, commerce in that commodity between the States...

...transporting goods destined for other States or brought from without the limits of Michigan and destined to places within that State she was engaged in commerce...have been, she was, so far as it went, subject to legislation of Congress. She was employed as an instrument of that commerce; for whenever a commodity...

...and thus become a subject of interstate commerce, does not change the situation, for it is only when a commodity has begun to move as an article of trade from one state to another that commerce in that commodity between states has commenced. Сое v. Errol, 116 US 517, 6 Sup. Ct....

...the United States supreme court. An article of merchandise comes under federal control only when it has begun to move as an article of trade from one state to another, because it is at that time that commerce in this commodity between the states begins. (16) A commodity...