 | United States. Department of Justice - 1919 - 688 sivua
...construction in such a case is thus stated by the Supreme Court in Rodgers v. United States, 185 US 83,87: "It is a canon of statutory construction that a later...repealing a prior special statute, will ordinarily not afi'ect the special provisions of such earlier statute. In other words, where there are two statutes,... | |
 | 1919 - 176 sivua
...decided September 30, 1919.) 2. ID; ID; Act No. 1510; STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION; REPEAL BY IMPLICATION. — A later statute general in its terms and not expressly...affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. Repeals of law by implication are not favored; and the mere repugnancy between the two statutes should... | |
 | United States. Department of Justice - 1920 - 740 sivua
...CUSTOMS SERVICE, 3. STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION. Effect of Subsequent General Act Upon Prior Special Act. — A later statute, general in its terms and not expressly...affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. 585. STOCK. BORROWING AND KETURN OF SHARES, ETC. See STAMP TAX. INCOME TAX ON DIVIDENDS. See INCOME... | |
 | Missouri. Supreme Court - 1922 - 868 sivua
...legislation. ' ' In Rodgers v. United* States, 185 US 83, at foot of page 87, Justice BREWER again said: "It is a canon of statutory construction that a later...and not expressly repealing a prior special statute, ivill ordinarily not affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. In other words, where there... | |
 | 1921 - 1056 sivua
...special or local act must be given the effect of establishing an exception to the general act. Hence it is a canon of statutory construction that a later...will ordinarily not affect the special provisions of the earlier statute." 25 RCL 927. (270 F.) In Washington v. Miller, 235 US 422, 428, 35 Sup. Ct. 119,... | |
 | 1926 - 410 sivua
...US 118, 124). 26: 449. 23. Repeal. — Effect of subsequent general act upon prior special act. — A later statute, general in its terms and not expressly...affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. 31:585. 24. Repeal by implication. — It is a fundamental and familiar rule that a repeal by implication... | |
 | United States. Court of Customs Appeals - 1926 - 784 sivua
...Worthington, 23 Fed. 248; and United States v. Gabriel, 36 Fed. 888. It is also a well-established canon of statutory construction that a later statute,...affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. Washington Trust Co. v. Dunaway, 169 Fed. 37 [461; Christie-Street Com. Co. v. United States, 136 Fed.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1933 - 154 sivua
...special or local act must be given the effect of establishing an exception to the general act. Hence it is a canon of statutory construction that a later...special statute, will ordinarily not affect the special provision of the earlier statute. Sutherland on Statutory Construction, recognized for many years as... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1933 - 152 sivua
...special or local act must be given the effect of establishing an exception to the general act. Hence it is a canon of statutory construction that a later...special statute, will ordinarily not affect the special provision of the earlier statute. Sutherland on Statutory Construction, recognized for many years as... | |
 | 1921 - 960 sivua
...with districts formed under special acts, and this follows a well-established rule of construction: "It is a canon of statutory construction that a later...provisions of such earlier statute. In other words, where No error. 107 SOUTHEASTERN REPORTEE there are two statutes, the earlier special and the later general... | |
| |
It is a canon of statutory construction that a later statute, general in its terms and not expressly repealing a prior special statute, will ordinarily not affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. 
