 | William Weeks Morrill - 1895 - 932 sivua
...this case the agreement between the sender of the message and the company was that the company should not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery, of the message sent, unless it was repeated, whether happening by negligence of its servants, or otherwise,... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1911 - 780 sivua
...charged in addition. It is agreed between the sender of the following message and this company that said company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission of any unrepeated message beyond the amount received for sending the same.' " It is claimed by the... | |
 | William Weeks Morrill - 1895 - 1082 sivua
...one-half the regular rate is charged in addition." "It is agreed between the sender, company, that said company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence of its servants or otherwise." If the language... | |
 | 1916 - 1138 sivua
...in consideration whereof it is agreed between the sender of the telegram and this company: "(1) The company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays...or delivery, or for nondelivery, of any unrepeated telegrams, beyond the amount Teceived for sending the same, nor for mistakes or delays in the transmission... | |
 | Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Edward Bell Green, Frank Dale, John Henry Burford, Robert Lee Williams, Matthew John Kane, Howard J. Parker, Charles Winfield Van Eaton - 1916 - 680 sivua
...on the back of a regular printed form upon which messages are written, that a telegraph company will not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or the nondelivery of an unrepeated message beyond the amount received for sending the same, is as applied... | |
 | 1917 - 1320 sivua
...mude a valid contract. That on the back was a statement that it was agreed that the company should not be liable for "mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for nondelivery, of any unrcpeated telegram, beyond the amount received for sending the same." That the message in question... | |
 | 1917 - 1334 sivua
...there was printed matter limiting liability. Among other limitations was one that defendant should not be "liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for nondelivery for any unrepeated message, beyond the amount received for sending the same; nor for mistakes or delays... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1917 - 920 sivua
...non-dellrery, of any UNREPEATED night letter, beyond the amount received for sending the same ; nor for mistakes or delays In the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery, of any REPEATED night letter, beyond Ofty times the sum received for sending the same, miles* tpecially valued;... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1917 - 944 sivua
...of the sender and to require payment of the higher rate of half as much again if the company is to be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or in the nondelivery of a message. The complainants urjre, however, that, unlike a shipment of goods... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1917 - 726 sivua
...IN CIPHER OR OBSCURE TELEGRAMS. "2. In any event the Company shall not be liable for damages for any mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery of this telegram, whether caused by the negligence of its servants or otherwise, beyond fifty times the... | |
| |
It is agreed between the sender of the following message and this company that said company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery, of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence of... 
